Answered

Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Why would Hooke's discovery have been impossible without the invention of the microscope? A. Because all living things are made up of cells. B. Because cells are too small to see without a microscope C. Because cells are the building blocks of life D. Because electron microscope are necessary to see cells

Sagot :

TaylorBayley
From the question you can immediately infer that it's either B or D, as A and C basically mean the same thing and it isn't anything related to a microscope. I can tell you now that you don't need an electron microscope to see cells, they're only required for the atomic level.
Therefore, the answer is B, as you can't see cells without a microscope but you only need a light microscope, not an electron microscope.
sophielilacforever

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.