Answered

Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding quick and accurate answers to your questions from professionals on our platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Why would Hooke's discovery have been impossible without the invention of the microscope? A. Because all living things are made up of cells. B. Because cells are too small to see without a microscope C. Because cells are the building blocks of life D. Because electron microscope are necessary to see cells

Sagot :

TaylorBayley
From the question you can immediately infer that it's either B or D, as A and C basically mean the same thing and it isn't anything related to a microscope. I can tell you now that you don't need an electron microscope to see cells, they're only required for the atomic level.
Therefore, the answer is B, as you can't see cells without a microscope but you only need a light microscope, not an electron microscope.
sophielilacforever

Answer:

B

Explanation:

We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.