Answered

Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Why would Hooke's discovery have been impossible without the invention of the microscope? A. Because all living things are made up of cells. B. Because cells are too small to see without a microscope C. Because cells are the building blocks of life D. Because electron microscope are necessary to see cells

Sagot :

TaylorBayley
From the question you can immediately infer that it's either B or D, as A and C basically mean the same thing and it isn't anything related to a microscope. I can tell you now that you don't need an electron microscope to see cells, they're only required for the atomic level.
Therefore, the answer is B, as you can't see cells without a microscope but you only need a light microscope, not an electron microscope.
sophielilacforever

Answer:

B

Explanation:

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.