Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

Why would Hooke's discovery have been impossible without the invention of the microscope? A. Because all living things are made up of cells. B. Because cells are too small to see without a microscope C. Because cells are the building blocks of life D. Because electron microscope are necessary to see cells

Sagot :

TaylorBayley
From the question you can immediately infer that it's either B or D, as A and C basically mean the same thing and it isn't anything related to a microscope. I can tell you now that you don't need an electron microscope to see cells, they're only required for the atomic level.
Therefore, the answer is B, as you can't see cells without a microscope but you only need a light microscope, not an electron microscope.
sophielilacforever

Answer:

B

Explanation:

We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.