Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Why would Hooke's discovery have been impossible without the invention of the microscope? A. Because all living things are made up of cells. B. Because cells are too small to see without a microscope C. Because cells are the building blocks of life D. Because electron microscope are necessary to see cells

Sagot :

TaylorBayley
From the question you can immediately infer that it's either B or D, as A and C basically mean the same thing and it isn't anything related to a microscope. I can tell you now that you don't need an electron microscope to see cells, they're only required for the atomic level.
Therefore, the answer is B, as you can't see cells without a microscope but you only need a light microscope, not an electron microscope.
sophielilacforever

Answer:

B

Explanation:

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.