Tibolla620
Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

How did the absolute monarchy in 17th century russia differ from the constitutional monarchy in 17th century england

Sagot :

mackiemesser
In Russia, the monarchy had to assert its dominant power to gain territory and improve the economy; in England, the monarchy depended on cooperation. 

In absolute monarchies the power is centralised, and decision making process is shortened, it allows rapid improvements and effective expansion, but is very unstable and dependant on the personality.

holesstanham

In Russia, the system of government during the 17th century was absolute monarchy. What this means is that, under this system, a king (or tzar) has complete power to act in any way he sees fit. This means that he is above the law, and that the rest of the government needs to respond to his wishes only.

On the other hand, the system that operated in England was that of a constitutional monarchy. Under this system, no one is above the law. This means that the monarch does not have absolute power because he still has to respect what the law states. Moreover, the government similarly needs to adhere to these laws, and therefore, the king cannot enforce his will, but he has to negotiate and collaborate with the rest of the government.

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.