Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding precise answers from a network of experienced professionals. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Answer:
The correct answer is D. The constitutional amendment that the Supreme Court cited in ruling that Chinese laundryman Lee Yick had been unfairly convicted was the 14th Amendment: "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Explanation:
This ruling established that laws that were neutral in racial matters could still violate the provisions of the 14th Amendment if they were applied in an unequal and discriminatory manner.
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.