Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
The correct answer is D. The constitutional amendment that the Supreme Court cited in ruling that Chinese laundryman Lee Yick had been unfairly convicted was the 14th Amendment: "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Explanation:
This ruling established that laws that were neutral in racial matters could still violate the provisions of the 14th Amendment if they were applied in an unequal and discriminatory manner.
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.