Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Answer:
The correct answer is D. The constitutional amendment that the Supreme Court cited in ruling that Chinese laundryman Lee Yick had been unfairly convicted was the 14th Amendment: "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Explanation:
This ruling established that laws that were neutral in racial matters could still violate the provisions of the 14th Amendment if they were applied in an unequal and discriminatory manner.
We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.