Westonci.ca makes finding answers easy, with a community of experts ready to provide you with the information you seek. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Answer:
The correct answer is D. The constitutional amendment that the Supreme Court cited in ruling that Chinese laundryman Lee Yick had been unfairly convicted was the 14th Amendment: "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Explanation:
This ruling established that laws that were neutral in racial matters could still violate the provisions of the 14th Amendment if they were applied in an unequal and discriminatory manner.
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.