Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts ready to help you find solutions. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
B) initiate wars in several places at once . . . assuming they have sufficient resources to supply each base, it is good to have deployment available at your fingertips when needed
If those are really the only two choices, under normal circumstances, it would be A. The reason is that bases make it easier to resupply vessels and also provide a military presence/protection. While in B, as a former military strategist studier, it would be a foolish nonstrategic reason. As you can see in past history, spreading yourself thin fighting against many countries in various areas prove unwise. Spreading yourself thin creates the possiblity of being overrun/undersupplied which will result in military loses. An example would be the U.S collision in the Persian Gulf war. The U.S won with sheer numbers along with better supplied and better trained/equipped who were also backed by its allies that Iraq never had a chance.
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.