At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
To solve this equation, we remember that perimeter p=16 in, and p=2L+2W. Replacing for p and using the distributive property in reverse, we can let our equation look like 16=2(L+W). Divide both sides by 2 to isolate the variables; our equation is now 8=L+W. From here, L, or the value of the rectangle's length, may be any value between 1 and 7, provided that the width W sums with it to make 8. For example, L could be 5 and W 3, and all would work out; any combination of 1-7, 2-6, 3-5, and 4-4 (a square) are possible combinations of the rectangle's side lengths. Obviously, a side length for a rectangle cannot be negative and cannot be 0, which is why our set of solutions is so small. For greater confidence, one can go back to the original equation and test the solution by plugging values into the formula. For example, 16=2(5)+(2)3 --> 16=10+6 --> 16=16. All good! If you're being really technical about the definitions of length vs. width, then you might need to stipulate that the length should always be the longer side, meaning that your set of results for L would only be {4,5,6,7}. A square is a rectangle, so the 4 value should be valid.
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.