Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Join our Q&A platform and connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions in various areas. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Answer:
The answer is "False"
Explanation:
Below are some of Regan's believes concerning animals:
* The animal rights movement is cut from the same moral cloth as these (human rights movement - the struggle to secure respect for human rights.)
* Rights view: their (example: animals for science) value were reducible to their usefulness to others, they are routinely, systematically treated with a lack of respect, and thus are their rights routinely, systematically violated.
* We can't justify harming or killing a human being (my aunt Bea, for example) just for these sorts of reason nor an animal. That is where our duty lies, according to the rights view DO NOT USE ANIMALS FOR SCIENCE
* Commercial chasing: ethical quality requires nothing not exactly the complete disposal of chasing
* Our acts, our deeds that changes things. all that philosophy can do, and all I have attempted, is to offer a vision of what our deeds should aim at. and the why. But not the how.
* No deep passions for animal rights: indirect duty views, utilitarianism, contrarianism disciplined passion: the fierce drive to excel, to do it right
demand of us that we overcome for them, the habits and forces behind their systematic oppression.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.
