At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
O B. It can increase the efficiency of decision making.
Explanation:
Having less people to vote typically generates a smaller chance of failing, as well as speeding up the process in which collecting the votes would be quicker and more efficient.
Imagine if the U.S. was a direct democracy. Votes would take weeks if not months to be counted, and there may be large proportions of people's votes thrown out due to failure to fill out forms properly. Recent news has also shown us that large amount of voter fraud already occurs, and this is just with popular votes which does not hold too much weight inside the actual election. If we were to drop indirect democracy for direct democracy, be sure that there will be more fraud from one side, more pressure from the other, and chaos all around.
~
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.