At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Explore our Q&A platform to find reliable answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Answer:
A. slaves were not citizens of the United States.
Explanation:
Dred Scott decision was a watershed decision ruled by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1857. A suit was filed in the court by Dred Scott demanding his freedom from slavery. He claimed that since his owner took him to free state Illinois from Missouri, and died there, Dred considered himself a free slave. But was brought back to slavery under Missouri Compromise Act. In 1857, the Chief Justice Roger B. Taney ruled that Dred Scott is a slave, and the term 'citizen' does not apply to slaves, therefore, none of the rights provided for citizens of the US apply to Dred Scott.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
The Chief Justice (Roger) of Supreme court in the case of Dred Scott argued that slaves were not citizens of the United States.
The Case of Dred Scott v. Sandford was about a fight for Slave right to become a citizen of United State.
The details of the Case entails that "Dred Scott" was a Slave who resides in a free state where slavery was prohibited and was not entitled to freedom to become a Citizen.
Hence, the Chief Justice (Roger) of the Supreme court in the case of Dred Scott argued that slaves were not citizens of the United States.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option A.
Read more about Dred Scott
brainly.com/question/12074767
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.