Answered

Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Experience the convenience of getting reliable answers to your questions from a vast network of knowledgeable experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

“Texas v. Johnson:” Which inference can be best made about Justice Brennan’s opinion on flag burning? options:
a) Extreme measures are needed to reinforce national unity.
b) State laws should be upheld before federal laws are enforced.
c) Punishment for flag burning should be clearly outlined by Congress.
d) Allowing the destruction of the flag symbolizes protection of freedom.

Sagot :

Parrain

Answer: d) Allowing the destruction of the flag symbolizes protection of freedom.

Explanation:

In 1984 Gregory Lee Johnson set fire to the American flag in Dallas, Texas in protest of policies by the Reagan administration. Texas at the time had a law that criminalised flag desecration and he was charged and convicted under this law.

When the case reached the Supreme Court, Justice Brennan was of the opinion that allowing the destruction of the flag symbolized the protection of freedom enshrined in the Constitution and people not liking the medium of protest was no reason for that to change.

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.