Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
The decision reached by the court was valid, in my view. Since the parties, Delavau, Inc. and Eastern Warehousing, Inc. had a valid contract in which they set out their understanding and agreement on the terms of their business relationship, the parties should follow the contract terms without distractions from pre-printed Form terms.
Having a formal contract is the only way to avoid the battle of forms.
Explanation:
The conflict involved a battle of conflicting forms. This battle of conflicting form, with different contract terms, occurred when Delavau, Inc. and Eastern Warehousing, Inc. exchanged contract terms, with Eastern's own small print terms on the reverse side its own receipts, which it wanted Delavau to comply with. That the court held that Delavau was not bound by Eastern's form terms was valid because their contract agreement specified the terms of their relationship, which cannot be negated by the form terms.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.