Answered

Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

If Jane is not maximizing her utility with the original purchase, remembering the Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility, would she be better off buying one less fries and one more chicken sandwich? Explain your reasoning and show any calculations.

Sagot :

jepessoa

Answer:

Since Jane's marginal utility per dollar spent is much greater for chicken sandwiches, that means that she is not maximizing her utility by purchasing fries. Instead of buying the third order of fries she should buy another chicken sandwich. The third order of fries only yields 3 utils per dollar. We are not given the exact utils per dollar of the fourth chicken sandwich, but the third one yielded 15 utils per dollar and the marginal decline is not that steep. The important number is the utils per dollar, not the price of the goods.

View image jepessoa
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.