At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the jeep has an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
Population mean; μ = 31.2
Sample mean; x¯ = 31.4
Sample size; n = 230
standard deviation; σ = 2.5
Significance level = 0.05
Let's define the hypotheses;
Null hypothesis; H0: μ = 31.2
Alternative hypothesis; Ha: μ ≠ 31.2
Formula for the test statistic is;
z = (x¯ - μ)/(σ/√n)
z = (31.4 - 31.2)/(2.5/√230)
z = 0.2/0.4564
z = 0.44
From online p-value from z-score calculator attached and using;
z = 0.44; two tailed hypothesis; significance value = 0.05
We have;
P-value = 0.659937
This p-value is greater than the significance value and thus, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the jeep has an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.