Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the jeep has an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
Population mean; μ = 31.2
Sample mean; x¯ = 31.4
Sample size; n = 230
standard deviation; σ = 2.5
Significance level = 0.05
Let's define the hypotheses;
Null hypothesis; H0: μ = 31.2
Alternative hypothesis; Ha: μ ≠ 31.2
Formula for the test statistic is;
z = (x¯ - μ)/(σ/√n)
z = (31.4 - 31.2)/(2.5/√230)
z = 0.2/0.4564
z = 0.44
From online p-value from z-score calculator attached and using;
z = 0.44; two tailed hypothesis; significance value = 0.05
We have;
P-value = 0.659937
This p-value is greater than the significance value and thus, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the jeep has an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating

Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.