Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

A publisher reports that 30% of their readers own a particular make of car. A marketing executive wants to test the claim that the percentage is actually more than the reported percentage. A random sample of 100 found that 37% of the readers owned a particular make of car. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the executive's claim

Sagot :

Answer:

we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there's insufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage is actually more than the reported percentage

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given;

Population proportion; p = 30% = 0.3

Sample proportion; p^ = 37% = 0.37

Sample size; n = 100

Let's define the hypotheses;

Null hypothesis; H0: p ≤ 0.3

Alternative hypothesis; Ha: p > 0.3

Formula for the test statistic is;

z = (p^ - p)/√(p(1 - p)/n)

Thus;

z = (0.37 - 0.3)/√(0.3(1 - 0.3)/100)

z = 0.07/0.04582575695

z = 1.53

From z-distribution table, at z=1.53 we have;

p-value = 1 - 0.9370 = 0.063

This p-value is greater than the significance level of 0.02 and thus we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there's insufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage is actually more than the reported percentage

Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.