Westonci.ca makes finding answers easy, with a community of experts ready to provide you with the information you seek. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Population Mean = 7.1
sample size = 24
Sample mean = 7.3
Standard deviation = 1.0
Level of significance = 0.025
The null hypothesis:
[tex]H_o: \mu = 7.1[/tex]
The alternative hypothesis:
[tex]H_a: \mu > 7.1[/tex]
This test is right-tailed.
[tex]degree \ of \ freedom= n - 1 \\ \\ degree \ of \ freedom = 24 - 1 \\ \\ degree \ of \ freedom = 23[/tex]
Rejection region: at ∝ = 0.025 and df of 23, the critical value of the right-tailed test [tex]t_c = 2.069[/tex]
The test statistics can be computed as:
[tex]t = \dfrac{ \hat X - \mu_o}{\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
[tex]t = \dfrac{ 7.3-7.1}{\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{24}}}[/tex]
[tex]t = \dfrac{0.2}{0.204}[/tex]
t = 0.980
Decision rule:
Since the calculated value of t is lesser than, i.e t = 0.980 < [tex]t_c = 2.069[/tex], then we do not reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to claim that the population mean is greater than 7.1 at 0.025 level of significance.
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.