Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Get detailed and precise answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Answer:
A & C =
It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
It overruled the Court of Appeals’ decision, which found that the students were indeed subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.
Explanation:
I just took the test and good it right
Hope this helps :)
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.