At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Answer:
A & C =
It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
It overruled the Court of Appeals’ decision, which found that the students were indeed subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.
Explanation:
I just took the test and good it right
Hope this helps :)
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.