Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Josiah claims that the ordered pair (6,-10) can be replaced with any ordered pair and the set will still represent a function. Select all ordered pairs that could be used to show that this claim is incorrect

Sagot :

Complete Question:

{(–9, 1), (–5, 2), (0, 7), (1, 3), (6, –10)} Josiah claims that the ordered pair (6, –10) can be replaced with any ordered pair and the set will still represent a function. Select all ordered pairs that could be used to show that this claim is incorrect.

A. (–10, –10)

B. (–9, –6)

C. (–5, 1)

D. (1, 12)

E. (4, 7)

Answer:

[tex]B.\ (-9, -6)[/tex]

[tex]C.\ (-5, 1)[/tex]

[tex]D.\ (1, 12)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

A relation is represented as:

[tex]R->\{(x_1,y_1),(x_2,y_2),(x_3,y_3)...(x_n,y_n)\}[/tex]

Where

[tex]x = domain[/tex]

[tex]y = range[/tex]

For a relation to be a function, the domain must be unique and must not be repeated.

In the given function,

[tex]\{(-9, 1), (-5, 2), (0, 7), (1, 3), (6, -10)\}[/tex]

The domains are [tex]\{-9,-5,0,1,6\}[/tex]

So, if (6,-10) is to be replaced;

The domain of the ordered pair that will replace it must not be any of [tex]\{-9,-5,0,1,6\}[/tex]

From the list of given options:

[tex]B.\ (-9, -6)[/tex]

[tex]C.\ (-5, 1)[/tex]

[tex]D.\ (1, 12)[/tex]

The above can not replace (6,-10) because their domain exist already.