Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Which detail best supports the inference that James Watt could not have made the improvement to his steam engine without the assistance of Matthew Boulton? The Steam Engine James Watt, who secured the position as a maker of scientific instruments in the University of Glasgow, proposed an idea for improving the existing steam engine, which was used for pumping mines. For a long time, owing to a lack of money, he had difficulty in establishing the merits of his improvements. Finally, he formed a partnership with Matthew Boulton, a wealthy and energetic man who lived at Birmingham, England. They began the manufacture of steam engines at Birmingham, under the firm name of Boulton and Watt. This partnership was very successful. Watt supplied the inventions; Boulton furnished the money and attended to the business. Before the time of Watt, the steam engine was exclusively a steam pump—slow and wasteful of fuel. Watt made it a quick, powerful, and efficient engine, requiring only a fourth as much fuel as before. Under his first patent, the engine was still used only as a steam pump, but his later improvements adapted it for driving stationary machinery of all kinds. The commercial success of his engine was soon fully established.

Sagot :

Answer:

Watt supplied the inventions; Boulton furnished the money and attended to the business.

The detail which best supports the inference that James Watt could not have made the improvement to his steam engine without the assistance of Matthew Boulton is:

  • Watt supplied the inventions; Boulton furnished the money and attended to the business.

What is an Inference?

This refers to the use of evidence which are formed from a set of premise to come to a conclusion about something.

With this in mind and from the given text, we can see that the detail which was used by the author to support the inference that there could not have been an improvement to the steam engine is that Watt and Boulton were in partnership.

Read more about inference here:
https://brainly.com/question/16750080