riley188
Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Geraldine is asked to explain the limits on the range of an exponential equation using the function f(x) = 2x. She makes these two statements:

1. As x increases infinitely, the y-values are continually doubled for each single increase in x.
2. As x decreases infinitely, the y-values are continually halved for each single decrease in x.

She concludes that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function. Which best explains the accuracy of Geraldine’s statements and her conclusion?

Statement 1 is incorrect because the y-values are increased by 2, not doubled.
Statement 2 is incorrect because the y-values are doubled, not halved.
The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of integers.
The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Sagot :

eriabn

Answer:

The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

omnicat

Answer:

The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.