riley188
Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Geraldine is asked to explain the limits on the range of an exponential equation using the function f(x) = 2x. She makes these two statements:

1. As x increases infinitely, the y-values are continually doubled for each single increase in x.
2. As x decreases infinitely, the y-values are continually halved for each single decrease in x.

She concludes that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function. Which best explains the accuracy of Geraldine’s statements and her conclusion?

Statement 1 is incorrect because the y-values are increased by 2, not doubled.
Statement 2 is incorrect because the y-values are doubled, not halved.
The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of integers.
The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Sagot :

eriabn

Answer:

The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

omnicat

Answer:

The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.