riley188
Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Geraldine is asked to explain the limits on the range of an exponential equation using the function f(x) = 2x. She makes these two statements:

1. As x increases infinitely, the y-values are continually doubled for each single increase in x.
2. As x decreases infinitely, the y-values are continually halved for each single decrease in x.

She concludes that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function. Which best explains the accuracy of Geraldine’s statements and her conclusion?

Statement 1 is incorrect because the y-values are increased by 2, not doubled.
Statement 2 is incorrect because the y-values are doubled, not halved.
The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of integers.
The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Sagot :

eriabn

Answer:

The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

omnicat

Answer:

The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.