Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Discover the answers you need from a community of experts ready to help you with their knowledge and experience in various fields. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Since the calculated value of t = -0.215 falls in the critical region so we accept Ha that SAT prep course improves the students' verbal SAT scores and reject the null hypothesis at significance level 0.05.
e. These results support the claim that the SAT prep course improves the students' verbal SAT scores.
Step-by-step explanation:
Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Score on first SAT 500 380 560 430 450 360 560
Score on second SAT 540 470 580 450 480 400 600
Difference d -40 -90 -20 -20 -30 -40 -40 ∑ -280
d² 1600 8100 400 400 900 1600 1600 ∑14600
a. Let the hypotheses be
H0: ud= 0 against the claim Ha: ud ≠0
The degrees of freedom = n-1= 7-1= 6
The significance level is 0.05
The test statistic is
t= d`/sd/√n
The critical region is ║t║≤ t (0.025,6) = ±2.447
d`= ∑di/n= -280/7= -4
Sd²= ∑(di-d`)²/n-1 = 1/n-1 [∑di²- (∑di)²n]
= 1/6[14600-(-4)²/7] = [14600-2.2857/6]= 2432.952
b. Sd= 49.3249= 49.325
Therefore
c. t= d`/ sd/√n
t= -4/ 49.325/√7
t= -4/18.6435 = -0.2145= -0.215
d. Since the calculated value of t = -0.215 falls in the critical region so we accept Ha that SAT prep course improves the students' verbal SAT scores and reject the null hypothesis at significance level 0.05
e. These results support the claim that the SAT prep course improves the students' verbal SAT scores.
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.