Answered

At Westonci.ca, we provide reliable answers to your questions from a community of experts. Start exploring today! Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Rey paid $91 for a watch that was on sale for 30% off. Grace and Curtis were debating how much the original price was. Grace said it would be $118.30 but Curtis said the original price should be $130, which person do you agree with? Why?

Sagot :

samuelonum1

Answer:

The original cost is $130

Step-by-step explanation:

Step one:

given data

We are told that Rey paid $91 for a watch that was on sale for 30%

let the original cost be x

so that 30% off x= $91 --------not the word  OFF not OF

Required

the original cost x

Step two

hence

x- 30/100*x= 91

x-0.3x=91

0.7x= 91

divide both sides by 0.7

x= 91/0.7

x=$130

Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.