lunaheart52207
Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Discover the answers you need from a community of experts ready to help you with their knowledge and experience in various fields. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Which of the following statements is true about using samples for research studies instead of entire populations?


Using a sample is more expensive, because more care must be taken selecting subjects.

Using a sample is more time-intensive, because more care must be taken selecting subjects.

Using a sample is more wasteful, because data about the rest of the population is not included.

Using a sample is more accurate, because more care must be taken assessing each response.

Please help!

Sagot :

lykabelle

Answer:

Using a sample is more accurate, because more care must be taken assessing each response.

Explanation:

A "sample" is considered more accurate than a population because it prevents bias when it comes to responses--provided that each response was carefully assessed. This can give an exact representation of the entire population.

It is definitely not more expensive, not more time-intensive nor wasteful because it is more manageable, cost-effective and feasible than a population.

We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.