lunaheart52207
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Which of the following statements is true about using samples for research studies instead of entire populations?


Using a sample is more expensive, because more care must be taken selecting subjects.

Using a sample is more time-intensive, because more care must be taken selecting subjects.

Using a sample is more wasteful, because data about the rest of the population is not included.

Using a sample is more accurate, because more care must be taken assessing each response.

Please help!

Sagot :

lykabelle

Answer:

Using a sample is more accurate, because more care must be taken assessing each response.

Explanation:

A "sample" is considered more accurate than a population because it prevents bias when it comes to responses--provided that each response was carefully assessed. This can give an exact representation of the entire population.

It is definitely not more expensive, not more time-intensive nor wasteful because it is more manageable, cost-effective and feasible than a population.

Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.