lunaheart52207
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Which of the following statements is true about using samples for research studies instead of entire populations?


Using a sample is more expensive, because more care must be taken selecting subjects.

Using a sample is more time-intensive, because more care must be taken selecting subjects.

Using a sample is more wasteful, because data about the rest of the population is not included.

Using a sample is more accurate, because more care must be taken assessing each response.

Please help!

Sagot :

lykabelle

Answer:

Using a sample is more accurate, because more care must be taken assessing each response.

Explanation:

A "sample" is considered more accurate than a population because it prevents bias when it comes to responses--provided that each response was carefully assessed. This can give an exact representation of the entire population.

It is definitely not more expensive, not more time-intensive nor wasteful because it is more manageable, cost-effective and feasible than a population.

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.