Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts on our user-friendly platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

HURRY PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!If private security forces are filling a need for more forces that the U.S. military does not have , why
should they be considered mercenaries and so be banned during war time?
The U.S. never signed the UN treaty, making it unclear as to whether it can be enforced or not.
Mercenaries serve a purpose according to the Geneva Convention.
The U.S. sometimes needs to use security forces as mercenaries.
The UN banned it under international law.


Sagot :

Answer:

Read Below

Explanation:

A mercenary, sometimes known as a soldier of fortune, is an individual who takes part in ... Indeed, the Geneva Conventions declare that mercenaries are not ... If they have not "in fact, taken a direct part in the hostilities" (APGC77 Art 47.b), ... to the conflict might insist that U.S. armed guards cannot be called mercenaries

We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.