Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a community of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
To emphasize the very real damage hate speech inflicts.
Explanation:
Prof. Laura Beth Nielsen wrote about the issue of hate speech in an op-ed and details the physical as well as mental 'illness' it can give a person. The issue of hate speech is much more than what meets the eye, and that it is something that is still plaguing the world.
In the given excerpt from the article, Nielsen uses the word "harm" continuously. This repetition is mostly used to lay great emphasis on the very word, and also to 'highlight' the effect on others. She remarks how hate speeches "collectively amount to the harm of subordination. The harm of perpetuating discrimination. The harm of creating inequality." And it is not just physical torment that it causes, but even has "mental health outcomes". She uses "harm" repetitively to emphasize the real damage that hate speeches inflict on the receivers.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
Answer:
A to emphasize the very real damage hate speech inflicts
Got it right
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.