Answered

Westonci.ca makes finding answers easy, with a community of experts ready to provide you with the information you seek. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Read the excerpt from "A Case for Restricting Hate Speech," by Laura Beth Nielsen. These negative physical and mental health outcomes—which embody the historical roots of race and gender oppression—mean that hate speech is not "just speech." Hate speech is doing something. It results in tangible harms that are serious in and of themselves and that collectively amount to the harm of subordination. The harm of perpetuating discrimination. The harm of creating inequality. What is the purpose of Nielsen’s repetition of the word harm? to emphasize the very real damage hate speech inflicts to show how many people repeatedly use hate speech against others to detail the negative physical health outcomes that arise from hate speech to demonstrate that inequality hurts those suffering from gender and race oppression

Sagot :

vaduz

Answer:

To emphasize the very real damage hate speech inflicts.

Explanation:

Prof. Laura Beth Nielsen wrote about the issue of hate speech in an op-ed and details the physical as well as mental 'illness' it can give a person. The issue of hate speech is much more than what meets the eye, and that it is something that is still plaguing the world.

In the given excerpt from the article, Nielsen uses the word "harm" continuously. This repetition is mostly used to lay great emphasis on the very word, and also to 'highlight' the effect on others. She remarks how hate speeches "collectively amount to the harm of subordination. The harm of perpetuating discrimination. The harm of creating inequality." And it is not just physical torment that it causes, but even has "mental health outcomes". She uses "harm" repetitively to emphasize the real damage that hate speeches inflict on the receivers.

Thus, the correct answer is the first option.

Answer:

A to emphasize the very real damage hate speech inflicts

Got it right

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.