Answered

Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence immediately after sentence 6. His argument was based on the assumption that the Brontosaurus’s five sacrum bones would have fused together into the Apatosaurus’s three sacrum bones with age. Should the writer make this addition?

A. Yes, because the sentence provides compelling evidence to support the claim that Othniel Charles Marsh found two different dinosaurs.
B. Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.
C. Yes, because the sentence provides useful scientific research on how bones commonly fuse together over time.
D. No, because the sentence contradicts the more recent findings by Tschopp’s team, discussed in the next paragraph.
E. No, because the sentence fails to explain why the Apatosaurus got to keep its name while the Brontosaurus did not.

Sagot :

Fahbreze

Answer:

Its B Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified. 100% correct

Explanation:

The sentence develops the reasoning of the paragraph by providing commentary that helps develop the explanation of how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified through Riggs’s assumption and subsequent argument. Without the sentence, the paragraph does not comment on how and why Riggs made the argument. Thus, adding the sentence to this paragraph allows the writer to explain how the argument Riggs made contributed to the Brontosaurus’s misclassification.

ProfChris1

The writer should consider adding the information.

The correct answer is

B. Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.

Looking at the sentence, we can discover that it actually provides commentary that helps in the development of the explanation.

It helps to develop the explanation of how Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.

This misclassification was due to Riggs's assumption and subsequent argument.

Thus, adding the sentence will enable the writer to further explain his argument on the misclassification of Brontosaurus.

Lean more about Brontosaurus on https://brainly.com/question/19810621

Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.