Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence immediately after sentence 6. His argument was based on the assumption that the Brontosaurus’s five sacrum bones would have fused together into the Apatosaurus’s three sacrum bones with age. Should the writer make this addition?

A. Yes, because the sentence provides compelling evidence to support the claim that Othniel Charles Marsh found two different dinosaurs.
B. Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.
C. Yes, because the sentence provides useful scientific research on how bones commonly fuse together over time.
D. No, because the sentence contradicts the more recent findings by Tschopp’s team, discussed in the next paragraph.
E. No, because the sentence fails to explain why the Apatosaurus got to keep its name while the Brontosaurus did not.

Sagot :

Fahbreze

Answer:

Its B Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified. 100% correct

Explanation:

The sentence develops the reasoning of the paragraph by providing commentary that helps develop the explanation of how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified through Riggs’s assumption and subsequent argument. Without the sentence, the paragraph does not comment on how and why Riggs made the argument. Thus, adding the sentence to this paragraph allows the writer to explain how the argument Riggs made contributed to the Brontosaurus’s misclassification.

ProfChris1

The writer should consider adding the information.

The correct answer is

B. Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.

Looking at the sentence, we can discover that it actually provides commentary that helps in the development of the explanation.

It helps to develop the explanation of how Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.

This misclassification was due to Riggs's assumption and subsequent argument.

Thus, adding the sentence will enable the writer to further explain his argument on the misclassification of Brontosaurus.

Lean more about Brontosaurus on https://brainly.com/question/19810621

Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.