Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

The authors discuss different scientists in the last two sentences of the passage primarily to
А
explain why some sciences have advanced further than others
B
correct a misconception about the nature of scientific rationality
С
underscore that all scientific thought ultimately rests on observation
D
resolve an apparent contradiction between empiricism and experimentalism
E
prove that their definition of science accurately represents the work of past scientists

Sagot :

Answer:

B I really hope this helped ;)

ogorwyne

The authors discuss the different scientists in the last sentence in order to

  • correct a misconception about the nature of scientific rationality

The answer to this question is option B.

The last paragraph of the passage tells on the importance of mathematics as a science subject. It explains the error that people have with the belief that scientific field is majorly full of mathematics.

With this the passage is trying to correct that belief that people have about the science field where they feel that mathematics is the major component that holds it together.

Read more on this passage here:

https://brainly.com/question/22243261

Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.