Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Read this paragraph from "Caring for Vets Should Be National Duty."

Of course, nonprofit organizations like the Wounded Warrior Project have been offering these life-affirming tools for well over a decade. But why should it be up to private charities to take care of those who battled and bled for their country?

Which word best describes the tone of the paragraph?


irate

frustrated

anxious

condescending


Sagot :

This comes off mostly as condescending to me.

The use of a rhetorical question at the end of the paragraph, "Why should it be up to private charities to take care of those who battled and bled for their country?" is almost like a challenge. Why isn't the government responsible? Like that.

The definition of condescending is having or showing a feeling of patronizing superiority. The author's tone, at least to me, sounds like they feel they are in a position to talk out about this. And towards the government, at least, the tone would be condescending.

The author isn't hand-wringing anxious, or extremely frustrated, either. That would leave the last option, condescending.

Answer:

condescending  

Explanation:

Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.