graciekgriffin06
Answered

At Westonci.ca, we provide reliable answers to your questions from a community of experts. Start exploring today! Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Read the passage and choose the best answer to the question.

Division 1 college athletes should be paid a small salary. Many college athletes have no money for daily life. Their scholarships cover housing, meals, and tuition, but they need money for other things. What if they need shampoo or a new pair of jeans? They often don’t have time to work because of their practices and games. Also, they may not be allowed to work part-time because of their scholarships. College sports bring in lots of money for the schools, so the players should get some of that.

Which piece of evidence best challenges the argument?

A-Paying college athletes makes them professionals, not amateurs.
B-Colleges and universities could bid on players, giving wealthy schools an advantage.
C-The 2 percent of high school grads playing Division 1 sports already get a free education.
D-College students could be irresponsible with any money they’re paid.

Sagot :

Undeadtillidie

Answer:

I think it's D but I'm not entirely sure as these could all be arguments

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.