Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
This is an example of an allocational border.
Explanation:
DR Congo and Uganda have a very problematic boundary. The reason for that is that the boundary is decided to be a river, but as we all know rivers are not static and they can change their courses and width over time, and in some cases, those changes can be rapid. The changes in the course and width of River Semliki have been numerous during the past 50 years, so there has constantly been a situation where territories were switching sides of the border.
Initially, neither DR Congo nor Uganda cared about that, as it was a very small population in question and it is an area that was not of interest. This all changed when reserves of oil were discovered in the area. Both nations want the resources for themselves, but the river is still changing courses regulary, so the resources also switch sides of the boundary. By doing so, the countries have developed a very tense relation, and a conflict is not excluded, giving a perfect example of an allocational boundary in action.
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.