Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Get accurate and detailed answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Farmers have long used aquifers as a source of groundwater for irrigation, but when water is conserved, they have to dig even deeper into the Earth to extract the water they need. Which argument do you believe that farmers will face using this process?

Argument 2: This is an affordable process and it can have a huge impact on the agriculture industry.
Argument 3: Groundwater is a valuable resource in the United States only and farmers will not have a problem with needing water for their crops.
Argument 4: Groundwater is a valuable resource in the United States and throughout the world, but farmers have an unlimited supply.
Argument 1: This is a costly process and it can have a huge impact on the agriculture industry.

Sagot :

foxtrotdelta72

Answer:

Argument 1.

Step-by-step explanation: This is not cheap, and if becomes impossible or to costly, the farm industry will collapse. food shortages sure will follow.

Answer:

I believe it's argument 2.

Explanation:

Farmers don't have to pay to dig for water.

We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.