Answered

Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Farmers have long used aquifers as a source of groundwater for irrigation, but when water is conserved, they have to dig even deeper into the Earth to extract the water they need. Which argument do you believe that farmers will face using this process?

Argument 2: This is an affordable process and it can have a huge impact on the agriculture industry.
Argument 3: Groundwater is a valuable resource in the United States only and farmers will not have a problem with needing water for their crops.
Argument 4: Groundwater is a valuable resource in the United States and throughout the world, but farmers have an unlimited supply.
Argument 1: This is a costly process and it can have a huge impact on the agriculture industry.

Sagot :

foxtrotdelta72

Answer:

Argument 1.

Step-by-step explanation: This is not cheap, and if becomes impossible or to costly, the farm industry will collapse. food shortages sure will follow.

Answer:

I believe it's argument 2.

Explanation:

Farmers don't have to pay to dig for water.

We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.