Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where experts provide clear and concise information on various topics. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Read the excerpt from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson.

That petitioner was a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Louisiana, of mixed descent . . . on June 7, 1892, he engaged and paid for a first class passage on the East Louisiana Railway . . . and thereupon entered a passenger train, and took possession of a vacant seat in a coach where passengers of the white race were accommodated; that such railroad company was incorporated by the laws of Louisiana as a common carrier, and was not authorized to distinguish between citizens according to their race. But, notwithstanding this, petitioner was required by the conductor, under penalty of ejection from said train and imprisonment, to vacate said coach and occupy another seat in a coach assigned by said company for persons not of the white race.

How does this relate to the premises of Brown v. Board of Education?
The Brown case addresses whether localities have the authority to label individuals by race.
The Brown case addresses whether the laws of Southern states are racially biased.
The Brown case addresses whether penalties and punishments can legally vary by race.
The Brown case addresses whether facilities separated by race are permissible by law.


Sagot :

Answer:

both have to do with segregation and issues with racism.

Explanation:

i don’t know if this is what ur looking for

Answer:

D) The Brown case addresses whether facilities seperated by race are permissible by law.

Explanation:

Edge 2021, Brainliest please <333