At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Chamberlain did what he could (should not have done it in any other way).
Explanation:
Chamberlain in his position as UK Prime Minister, going to such events as the Munich Conference, Germany was prepared for both options if Hitler refused or not. Hitler only agreed to stall time and his preparations for Czechoslovakia were already underway. If Chamberlain demanded better terms then Hitler would most likely refuse to sign it. It is possible if Britain and France had said something about the Remilitarization of the Rhineland then Hitler would have stopped these moves of aggression. Obviously, this move was a huge gamble for Hitler that paid off since France and Britain lacked the knowledge of a semi-weak Germany; instead, they saw legions of soldiers marching into the Rhineland fearing another war would come. If Chamberlain refused to negotiate, then that throws diplomacy right out the window and both Britain and France did not want to start another war so that is out of the question.
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.