Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

3. Which of the following is a difference between White's and Hahn's claims in the excerpts about how
American Indian societies changed in the late 1800s?
A White claims that reservations reduced American Indian autonomy from the United States, while Hahn claims
reservations could be used to resist federal encroachment.
BWhite argues that federal supervision of American Indians decreased, while Hahn argues that the United States
came to control all aspects of their lives on reservations.
cWhite asserts that American Indians came to be governed directly by the United States, while Hahn asserts that
they remained outside the jurisdiction of the United States.
D White contends that American Indians retained possession of much land, while Hahn contends that they lost
possession of most of their land to United States settlers.


Sagot :

Answer:

A

Explanation:

my teacher did it in class

During the late 1800s, there was a massive change with the native Americans that led to a difference between the White's and Hahn's claims, the difference was:

Option A. The White people claimed that the reservations have reduced the American Indian autonomy from the United States, but the Hahn claimed that the reservations could be used to resist the federal encroachment.

During the period of late 1800s, the government of the United States made policy towards Native Americans, and that was most of the Native Americans who were removed from the reservations primarily in the West were forced on assimilating in the European-American culture.

To know more about the late 1800s, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/22842908