Answered

Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Discover solutions to your questions from experienced professionals across multiple fields on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

1) Do you think the government should be allowed to restrict certain
forms of speech during wartime? Why or why not?
2) Should the First Amendment protect hate speech? Why or why not?

Sagot :

acklinj

Answer:

1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.

2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.

We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.