Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately from our dedicated community of professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
the statement is valid!
Step-by-step explanation:
first, let's consider the first statement "if an animal has feathers, then it is a bird"
well, let's think about this: are there any animals that have feathers that AREN'T birds? No!
so we know the first statement is true so it is valid
now, let's consider the second statement "a crow has feathers, so it is a bird"
is that true? well based on the first statement, if an animal has feathers it's a bird. so yes! the statement is valid
Answer: The statement is valid.
======================================================
Explanation:
This is valid by the law of detachment. This is also known as "modus ponens".
The basic format is that we have these two premises
- If P is true, then Q is true
- P is true
Those two premises work together to conclude that Q must be true. Think of it like a set of dominoes. The first domino that you knock over is statement P, which then leads to domino Q being knocked over afterward (ie statement Q must be true because P is true).
We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.
