Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Answer:
the statement is valid!
Step-by-step explanation:
first, let's consider the first statement "if an animal has feathers, then it is a bird"
well, let's think about this: are there any animals that have feathers that AREN'T birds? No!
so we know the first statement is true so it is valid
now, let's consider the second statement "a crow has feathers, so it is a bird"
is that true? well based on the first statement, if an animal has feathers it's a bird. so yes! the statement is valid
Answer: The statement is valid.
======================================================
Explanation:
This is valid by the law of detachment. This is also known as "modus ponens".
The basic format is that we have these two premises
- If P is true, then Q is true
- P is true
Those two premises work together to conclude that Q must be true. Think of it like a set of dominoes. The first domino that you knock over is statement P, which then leads to domino Q being knocked over afterward (ie statement Q must be true because P is true).
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.