At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Answer:
the statement is valid!
Step-by-step explanation:
first, let's consider the first statement "if an animal has feathers, then it is a bird"
well, let's think about this: are there any animals that have feathers that AREN'T birds? No!
so we know the first statement is true so it is valid
now, let's consider the second statement "a crow has feathers, so it is a bird"
is that true? well based on the first statement, if an animal has feathers it's a bird. so yes! the statement is valid
Answer: The statement is valid.
======================================================
Explanation:
This is valid by the law of detachment. This is also known as "modus ponens".
The basic format is that we have these two premises
- If P is true, then Q is true
- P is true
Those two premises work together to conclude that Q must be true. Think of it like a set of dominoes. The first domino that you knock over is statement P, which then leads to domino Q being knocked over afterward (ie statement Q must be true because P is true).
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.
