At Westonci.ca, we provide reliable answers to your questions from a community of experts. Start exploring today! Get detailed and precise answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer and Explanation:
1. Given these facts, we can conclude that the store, represented by its employee, did not take responsibility for something that happened in its establishment, even refusing to promote aid to a victim who was a store employee.
2. She can quote Carey v Davis, where Carey, after passing out from sunstroke, did not receive due help from his boss Frank Davis, who dragged him out and left him in the sun, who caused several injuries to his body.
3. She does not have any relationship with the store's customer, who, she did not even know and had no proximity to.
4. She can win the lawsuit against the store, which has proved irresponsible and inhuman.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.