Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Ask your questions and receive accurate answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields on our platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

The ruling in miranda v arizona most affected the procedure in which step of this process

Sagot :

jenniferanne617
Miranda v Arizona affected what police must tell people about their rights when they are arrested. For example, Police explain that the suspect has the right remain silent and to have an attorney,
jayilych4real

The ruling in Miranda v Arizona most affected the procedure in the step of:

  • The police informing people of their rights when they are arrested

According to the Miranda vs Arizona ruling in the United States, you can see that the police did not inform the suspects of their rights and they went ahead and confessed for their crimes.

However, when this was used as evidence in their prosecution, their defense counsel made a compelling argument that it was inadmissible because their client was not informed of his rights or that what he said could be used against him in a court of law.

As a result of this, we can see that this changed the way the police informed people of their rights when arresting them.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/18845922

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.