Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

The ruling in miranda v arizona most affected the procedure in which step of this process

Sagot :

jenniferanne617
Miranda v Arizona affected what police must tell people about their rights when they are arrested. For example, Police explain that the suspect has the right remain silent and to have an attorney,
jayilych4real

The ruling in Miranda v Arizona most affected the procedure in the step of:

  • The police informing people of their rights when they are arrested

According to the Miranda vs Arizona ruling in the United States, you can see that the police did not inform the suspects of their rights and they went ahead and confessed for their crimes.

However, when this was used as evidence in their prosecution, their defense counsel made a compelling argument that it was inadmissible because their client was not informed of his rights or that what he said could be used against him in a court of law.

As a result of this, we can see that this changed the way the police informed people of their rights when arresting them.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/18845922

Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.