Answered

Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of seasoned experts on our user-friendly platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

The ruling in miranda v arizona most affected the procedure in which step of this process

Sagot :

jenniferanne617
Miranda v Arizona affected what police must tell people about their rights when they are arrested. For example, Police explain that the suspect has the right remain silent and to have an attorney,
jayilych4real

The ruling in Miranda v Arizona most affected the procedure in the step of:

  • The police informing people of their rights when they are arrested

According to the Miranda vs Arizona ruling in the United States, you can see that the police did not inform the suspects of their rights and they went ahead and confessed for their crimes.

However, when this was used as evidence in their prosecution, their defense counsel made a compelling argument that it was inadmissible because their client was not informed of his rights or that what he said could be used against him in a court of law.

As a result of this, we can see that this changed the way the police informed people of their rights when arresting them.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/18845922

Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.