Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.