Answered

Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Refer to the Newsela article "The Relationship between Hunger and War."

What is the author's viewpoint in the article?

• Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.

•Humanitarian aid is the solution to ending food insecurity.

•By ending wars, nations can eliminate famine.

•The United Nations has done little to address the use of starvation as a weapon.

Sagot :

Parrain

Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.

Explanation:

In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.

Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.

camelita101

Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.

Explanation:

i took the test

Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.