Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Such results only tell us how well one is programmed to regurgitate mostly useless information, mostly in regards to one of 7 kinds of intelligence.
This can be a good indicator on whether or not a person will be able to handle even higher amounts of regurgitation of information at the university level. The hope is that students will major in a study that will at least expose them to the tools of critical thinking, which is mostly limited to the hard sciences.
“Learners” who score high can will feel overblown grandiose feelings, and see themselves as superior to those with lower scores, regardless of their future accomplishments (or lack of them). “Learners” who score low will tend to feel humbled and maybe depressed, in that they are typecast as being somehow unable to be much of a future contributor to society.
Fortunately, a significant number of people at ANY point of the spectrum of such scoring to see how well trained a monkey they are, realize the absurdity of such scoring, and go on to find out where they DO excel in one of the other 7 kinds of intelligence. They often end up contributing MORE to society, once they find there “gift” where they “score” much higher
Explanation:
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.
