Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Tyesha found that the z-statistic was 2.1 and that the critical z-values were -1.96 and 1.96. Which of the following is a valid conclusion based on these results?
One can reject the null hypothesis.
One can reject the alternate hypothesis.
One can accept the null hypothesis.
One cannot accept or reject the null hypothesis.

Sagot :

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If the z statistic does not lie within the critical region, you cannot reject the null hypothesis but neither can you necessarily accept it.  

What you can do is reject the alternate hypothesis.

The valid conclusion based on the given results is; One can reject the alternate hypothesis.

What is the Conclusion of the Hypothesis?

We are told that;

z-statistic = 2.1

Now, the critical z-values were -1.96 and 1.96

Since our z-statistic does not lie within the critical values region, it means that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the given significance level. However, it means that we can reject the alternate hypothesis.

Read more on hypothesis conclusion at; https://brainly.com/question/15980493

Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.