Answered

Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Ask your questions and receive accurate answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields on our platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Tyesha found that the z-statistic was 2.1 and that the critical z-values were -1.96 and 1.96. Which of the following is a valid conclusion based on these results?
One can reject the null hypothesis.
One can reject the alternate hypothesis.
One can accept the null hypothesis.
One cannot accept or reject the null hypothesis.

Sagot :

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If the z statistic does not lie within the critical region, you cannot reject the null hypothesis but neither can you necessarily accept it.  

What you can do is reject the alternate hypothesis.

The valid conclusion based on the given results is; One can reject the alternate hypothesis.

What is the Conclusion of the Hypothesis?

We are told that;

z-statistic = 2.1

Now, the critical z-values were -1.96 and 1.96

Since our z-statistic does not lie within the critical values region, it means that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the given significance level. However, it means that we can reject the alternate hypothesis.

Read more on hypothesis conclusion at; https://brainly.com/question/15980493

We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.