Answered

Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding precise answers from a network of experienced professionals. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Tyesha found that the z-statistic was 2.1 and that the critical z-values were -1.96 and 1.96. Which of the following is a valid conclusion based on these results?
One can reject the null hypothesis.
One can reject the alternate hypothesis.
One can accept the null hypothesis.
One cannot accept or reject the null hypothesis.

Sagot :

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If the z statistic does not lie within the critical region, you cannot reject the null hypothesis but neither can you necessarily accept it.  

What you can do is reject the alternate hypothesis.

The valid conclusion based on the given results is; One can reject the alternate hypothesis.

What is the Conclusion of the Hypothesis?

We are told that;

z-statistic = 2.1

Now, the critical z-values were -1.96 and 1.96

Since our z-statistic does not lie within the critical values region, it means that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the given significance level. However, it means that we can reject the alternate hypothesis.

Read more on hypothesis conclusion at; https://brainly.com/question/15980493

Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.