Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
The advantage is like the article stated "Over time, J. T. guided Sudhir into a world that few outsiders have ever known,". To put into lamen's terms Sudhir got a inside peek at what most researches look away or far back from a cage of violence, prositution and gangs. The disadvantage can be a ethical, moral case that Sudhir violated. For example, by getting involved in the action of what he was studying, he messed with the research by becoming a recipient in the study and now there's question the validity. He doesn't need to justify because he was a bystander and besides what's the best course of action when two criminal gangs decide to fight each with guns, call the police? When it had to due with beatings although I more of a moral grey area for me based on the fact that I'm just a bistander and there's no guns involved. I think the opposition's main argument is that Sudhir was reckless and he's moral compass is secrewed up
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.
