Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Answer:
Each piece uses certain wording to try to pull us over to their side. In ‘Let People own Exotic Pets,’ some loaded language is used, such as “If society overreacts and bans exotics because of actions of a few deranged individuals, then we need to ban kids, as that is the only way to totally stop child abuse.” The article,‘Wild Animals aren't Pets’ gives a short notice, “Or how potentially tragic.” Both of these are effective because they make us imagine how “tragic,” and what it would be like for kids to be “banned.”
Each author made a claim, and each one argued about one topic: whether we should be able to own exotic pets or not. The commentary ‘Let People own Exotic Animals’ states that “Responsible private ownership of exotic animals should be legal if animal welfare is taken care of.” On the other hand, the article ‘Wild Animals aren't Pets’ states that “We’re not suggesting that people who own these animals are cruel. Many surely love them. But public safety, common sense and compassion for animals all dictate the same conclusion.” The authors do, in fact, include enough evidence to support the claim.
I hope this helps! I have the same article, so I know what to write.]
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.
