Welcome to Westonci.ca, the Q&A platform where your questions are met with detailed answers from experienced experts. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts ready to help you find solutions. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Answer:
There is not enough statistical evidence to conclude that the cumulative incidence of prostrate cancer among 50-year old men differs from that of 70-year old men
Step-by-step explanation:
The population 10 year cumulative incidence of prostrate cancer among 70 year old men, p = 0.06
The number of 50 year old men in the sample, n = 260 men
The number of the sampled men that developed prostrate cancer = 13 men
The significance level, α = 0.05
Let the null hypothesis, H₀: [tex]\hat{p}[/tex] = p
The alternative hypothesis, Hₐ: [tex]\hat{p}[/tex] ≠ p
The standard score, [tex]z_{\alpha /2}[/tex] = 1.96
The test statistic, 'z', is given as follows;
[tex]z=\dfrac{\hat{p}-p}{\sqrt{\dfrac{p \cdot q}{n}}}[/tex]
[tex]\hat{p}[/tex] = 13/260 = 0.05
q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.06 = 0.94
[tex]Therefore, \ z=\dfrac{0.05-0.06}{\sqrt{\dfrac{0.06 \times 0.94}{260}}} = \dfrac{\sqrt{9165} }{141} \approx -0.68[/tex]
From the z-table, we find the p-value as follows;
P(z ≈ -0.68) = 0.24825
Therefore, given that the p-value, 0.24825 is larger than the significance level, α/2 = 0.025, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, and therefore, there is not enough statistical evidence to conclude that the cumulative incidence of prostrate cancer among 50-year old men differs from that of 70-year old men
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.
