Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across different disciplines on our comprehensive platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Explanation:
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515, was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.
Answer:
Georgia
Explanation:
In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice John Marshall, the Court held that the Georgia act, under which Worcester was prosecuted, violated the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States. (1832), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign. According to the decision rendered by Chief Justice John Marshall, this meant that Georgia had no rights to enforce state laws in its territory.
We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.