sandyossandyos
Answered

Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Help please
Read this excerpt from a passage.
"People around the globe began to notice and to speak out against the possible disappearance (or extinction) of the African elephant.
Finally, the world acted. In 1990, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), a United Nations effort, banned
the ivory trade worldwide. As a result, elephants started to make a comeback. By 1999, their population had returned to approximately
one million."
Which sentence from this excerpt is not objective?A:
"In 1990, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), a United Nations effort, banned the ivory trade
worldwide."
B:O "By 1999, their population had returned to approximately one million."
C:O "Finally, the world acted."
D:O "As a result, elephants started to make a comeback."

Sagot :

charlie37hathaway
the answer is C.

while i wouldn’t consider sentence C especially subjective, all of the other excerpts are very clearly objective. the use of the word “finally” implies that the author thinks the world had not made efforts or acted until that point. as we don’t know what efforts CITES made before the banning of ivory trade, we cannot determine whether this banning was CITES “finally acting”. this leaves the authors opinion clearly, hence making it subjective and not objective.

The sentence from this excerpt  which is not objective is Finally, the world acted.

What is message behind the excerpt?

It wouldn't consider sentence  particularly emotional, each of different portions are obviously evenhanded. the utilization of "at last" suggests that the creator thinks the world had not put forth attempts or acted until that point.

As it  don't have the foggiest idea what endeavors CITES made before the forbidding of ivory exchange, we can't decide if this restricting was CITES "at last acting". this leaves the creators assessment plainly, subsequently making it emotional and not evenhanded.

The entry we are examining here presents a circumstances and logical results structure. It shows how one thing happened due to another. Here, the reason is the interest for ivory in the nineteenth hundred years.

The impact of such a reason was the radical decrease in elephant populaces in Africa. As indicated by the text, in light of the fact that the interest for ivory expanded, more elephants were killed to supply that interest. Accordingly, elephant populaces were diminished.

For more information about  CITES, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/15112310

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.