Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

HELP I HAVE 20 MINUTES TO ANSWER!!!!!
In the 1983 case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, did the Supreme Court agree or disagree with the principal and why? (4 points)

Group of answer choices

The Supreme Court agreed with the principal but said the article could be published in the school newspaper as long as the father's response was also included in the article.

The Supreme Court agreed with the principal, stating educational administrators had the right to censor material that was deemed contrary to the school's educational mission.

The Supreme Court disagreed with the principal, citing Tinker v. Des Moines and stated the principal had violated the students' First Amendment rights of freedom of speech.

The Supreme Court disagreed with the principal, stating that newspaper editors could print students' stories and opinions without censorship as long as the material was not profane

Sagot :

mieshaowens

Answer:

I Thinks it is A or B sorry if i'm not right

Explanation:

Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.