Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Discover a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Led Foot drives his car carelessly into another car. The second car contains dynamite, a fact that Led had no way of knowing. The collision causes an explosion, which shatters a window of a building half a block away on another street. The flying glass inflicts serious cuts on Sally, who is working at a desk near the window. The explosion also harms Vic, who is walking on the sidewalk near the point of the collision. Toward whom is Led Foot negligent?

Sagot :

fichoh

Answer:

Led Foot is negligent Towards Vic

Explanation:

The injury inflicted on both Sally and Vic resulted from the explosion caused when Led Foot hit another car containing explosives. Vic in this case is a pedestrian while Sally isn't. Led Foot is negligent towards Vic because careless driving of any sort will definitely pose a certain level of threat or harm to pedestrians nearby. However, in Sally's case who isn't a pedestrian could be classed among the group of people residing outside the risk zone. Hence, even though Sally was hurt as a result of shattered glass triggered by the explosion ; Led Foot isn't negligent towards Sally.

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.