Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide detailed answers to your questions in various areas. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information given:
let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] be the men of the population 1 (Raymondville) and [tex]\mu_2[/tex] be the mean of the population 2 (Rosenberg).
Here the Restaurateur wants to prove that Raymondville residents dine out more often than Rosenberg residents.
i.e [tex]\mu_1 > \mu _2[/tex]
The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis:
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2 \\ \\ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2\ \ vs \ \ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2 \implies \text{upper tailed test}[/tex]
The shows that this test is one-tailed with the rejection area on the right side.
The appropriate decision: is to reject [tex]\mathbf{H_o}[/tex] if the test statistics is greater than the critical value)
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.