Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across different disciplines on our comprehensive platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information given:
let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] be the men of the population 1 (Raymondville) and [tex]\mu_2[/tex] be the mean of the population 2 (Rosenberg).
Here the Restaurateur wants to prove that Raymondville residents dine out more often than Rosenberg residents.
i.e [tex]\mu_1 > \mu _2[/tex]
The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis:
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2 \\ \\ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2\ \ vs \ \ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2 \implies \text{upper tailed test}[/tex]
The shows that this test is one-tailed with the rejection area on the right side.
The appropriate decision: is to reject [tex]\mathbf{H_o}[/tex] if the test statistics is greater than the critical value)
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.