Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Moderately Agree that it enhanced unity, national price, self reliance. But don't agree that it was 'necessary'
Explanation:
Britishers ruled India from around late 1750s to 1947. India's freedom from exploitative colonial rule was remarkable. The freedom struggle & fight ignited a sense of national unity, national pride - irrespective of caste, creed, community, gender, class. A sense self reliance & urge for freedom was unitedly looked upon, as evident from movements like 'quit india' 'swadeshi'.
However, their rule by divide & rule policy also created many communal rifts. Also, such immensely exploitative rule, which by chance had a positive side effect of unity among adversity - cant be called 'necessary' (it would be unjustified to call it that). Unity & national pride could be achieved by some progressive means also.
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.