Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

A contract is made between two parties. The terms of the contract are complete and unambiguous. A dispute arises between the Parties. Party A wants to pull out of the contract without penalty. Party B argues that Party A’s proposed action is prohibited by the express terms of the contract. Party A argues that the Parties verbally agreed to ignore that provision of the contract that would impose a penalty on Party A. Which Party will prevail and why?

Sagot :

Parrain

Answer: Party B

Explanation:

Even though verbal agreements are enforceable by law, written agreements take precedent because they are more explicit than verbal agreements.

The written agreement will therefore be followed in this case and according to this agreement, A will be punished for the proposed action.

If A had tangible proof that a subsequent agreement was reached that would void them of said punishment, they should present it. If they do not, B would prevail.

Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.